One developer’s journey bringing Dependabot to GitHub Enterprise Server
A personal story about building the feature you want and sharing it with the world.
![](https://github.blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Product-Engineering-Scurity.png?resize=1200%2C630)
If you’re like me, you’re still excited by last week’s news that Dependabot is generally available on GitHub Enterprise Server (GHES). Developers using GHES can now let Dependabot secure their dependencies and keep them up-to-date. You know who would have loved that? Me at my last job.
Before joining GitHub, I spent five years working on teams that relied on GHES to host our code. As a GHES user, I really, really wanted Dependabot. Here’s why.
🤕 Dependencies
One constant pain point for my previous teams was staying on top of dependencies. Creating a Rails project with rails new
results in an app with 74 dependencies, Django apps start with 88 dependencies, and a project initialized with Create React App will have 1,432 dependencies!
Unfortunately, security vulnerabilities happen, and they can expose your customers to existential risk, so it’s important they are handled as soon as they’re published.
As I’m most familiar with the Ruby ecosystem, I’ll use Nokogiri, a gem for parsing XML and HTML, to illustrate the process of manually resolving a vulnerability. Nokogiri has been a dependency of every Rails app I’ve maintained. It’s also seen seven vulnerabilities since 2019. To fix these manually, we’ve had to:
- Clone `my_rails_app`
- Track down and parse the Nokogiri release notes
- Patch Nokogiri in `my_rails_app` to a non-vulnerable version
- Push the changes and open a pull request
- Wait for CI to pass
- Get the necessary reviews
- Deploy, observe, and merge
This is just one of (at least) 74 dependencies in one Rails app. My team maintained 14 Rails apps in our microservices-based architecture, so we needed to repeat the process for each app. A single vulnerability would eat up days of engineering time. That’s just one dependency in one ecosystem. We also worked on apps written in Elixir, Python, JavaScript, and PHP.
If an engineer was patching vulnerabilities, they couldn’t pursue feature work, the thing our customers could actually see. This would, understandably, lead to conversations about which vulnerabilities were most likely to be exploited and which we could tolerate for now.
If we had Dependabot security updates, that process would have started with a pull request. What took an engineer days to complete on their own could have been done before lunch.
We could have invested in keeping all of our dependencies up-to-date. Incremental upgrades are typically easier to perform and pose less risk. They also give bad actors less time to find and exploit vulnerabilities. One of my previous teams was still running Rails 3.2, which was no longer maintained when Rails 6 was released six years later. As support phased out, we had to apply our own security patches to our codebase instead of getting them from the framework. This made upgrading even harder. We spent years trying to get to a supported version, but other product priorities always won out.
If my team had Dependabot version updates, Dependabot would have opened pull requests each time a new version of Rails was released. We’d still need to make changes to ensure our apps were compliant with the new versions, but the changes would be made incrementally, making the lift much lighter. But we didn’t have Dependabot. We had to upgrade manually, and that meant upgrading didn’t happen until it became a P0.
A new home
I joined GitHub in 2021 to work on Dependabot. Being intimately familiar with the challenges Dependabot could help address, I wanted to be part of the solution. Little did I know, the team was just starting the process of bringing Dependabot to GHES. Call it serendipity, a dream come true, or tea leaves arranged just so.
I quickly realized why Dependabot wasn’t already on GHES. GitHub acquired Dependabot in 2019, and it took some time to scale Dependabot to be able to secure GitHub’s millions of repositories. To achieve this, we ported the service’s backend to run on Moda, GitHub’s internal Kubernetes-based platform. The dependency update jobs that result in pull requests were updated to run on lightweight Firecracker VMs, allowing Dependabot to create millions of pull requests in just hours. It was an impressive effort by a small team.
That effort, however, didn’t lend itself to the architecture of GHES, where everything runs on a single server with limited resources. An auto-scaling backend and network of VMs wasn’t an option. Instead, we needed to port Dependabot’s backend to run on Nomad, the container orchestration option on GHES. The jobs running on Firecracker VMs needed to run on our customers’ hardware. Fortunately, organizations can self-host GitHub Actions runners in GHES, so we adapted them to run on GitHub Actions. We also had to adjust our development processes to support continuous delivery in the cloud and less frequent GHES releases.
The result is that developers relying on GHES now have the option to have their dependencies updated for them. Now, my former teammates can update their dependencies by:
- Viewing the already opened pull request
- Reviewing the pull request and the included release notes
- Deploying, observing, and merging
We’re really proud of that. As for me, I get the immense satisfaction of knowing that I built something that will directly benefit my former teammates. It doesn’t get much better than that!
Guess what? GitHub is hiring. What would you like to make better?
If you’re inspired to work at GitHub, we’d love for you to join us. Check out our Careers page to see all of our current job openings.
- Dedicated remote-first company with flexible hours
- Building great products used by tens of millions of people and companies around the world
- Committed to nurturing a diverse and inclusive workplace
- And so much more!
Tags:
Written by
Related posts
![](https://github.blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Enterprise-LightMode-4.png?resize=400%2C212)
GitHub Enterprise: The best migration path from AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit is discontinuing new customer access and will no longer introduce new features. Learn how to migrate to GitHub Enterprise and why it’s the best option for you.
![](https://github.blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Enterprise-DarkMode-2-3.png?resize=400%2C212)
GitHub Actions, Arm64, and the future of automotive software development
Learn how GitHub’s Enterprise Cloud, GitHub Actions, and Arm’s latest Automotive Enhanced processors, work together to usher in a new era of efficient, scalable, and flexible automotive software creation.
![A schematic diagram depicting the steps an SAST tool takes to scan the source code of an SQL application under an SQL injection attack. The first step is tokenizing the source code, the second is abstracting the source code, the third conducting semantic analysis, the fourth conducting taint analysis, and the last generating a security alert about the SQL injection vulnerability.](https://github.blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/sast-tool-diagram.png?resize=400%2C212)
The architecture of SAST tools: An explainer for developers
More developers will have to fix security issues in the age of shifting left. Here, we break down how SAST tools can help them find and address vulnerabilities.