Load Balancing at GitHub
We’ve had a number of inquiries into why we chose ldirectord as our primary load balancer for the new GitHub architecture. As I’ve mentioned before (and more on this later),…
We’ve had a number of inquiries into why we chose ldirectord as our primary load balancer for the new GitHub architecture. As I’ve mentioned before (and more on this later), we’ve hired the excellent team at Anchor as our server specialists. Our team lead over there is Matt Palmer, and we left the choice of load balancer up to him and his expertise. He’s taken it upon himself to explain the driving factors behind his choice, and it makes for an enlightening read if you’re interested in such things. Just head on over to the Anchor blog to check it out:
http://www.anchor.com.au/blog/2009/10/load-balancing-at-github-why-ldirectord/
Be sure to read the comments where the author of haproxy weighs in on the post and adds some additional perspective. Like most technology decisions, there is no single correct answer. Only tradeoffs and preferences.
Written by
Related posts
GitHub availability report: March 2026
In March, we experienced four incidents that resulted in degraded performance across GitHub services.
GitHub Universe is back: We want you to take the stage
Get inspired by five of the most memorable, magical, and quirky Universe sessions to date.
What’s coming to our GitHub Actions 2026 security roadmap
A look at GitHub Actions’ 2026 roadmap, outlining how secure defaults, policy controls, and CI/CD observability harden the software supply chain end to end.