Load Balancing at GitHub
We’ve had a number of inquiries into why we chose ldirectord as our primary load balancer for the new GitHub architecture. As I’ve mentioned before (and more on this later),…
We’ve had a number of inquiries into why we chose ldirectord as our primary load balancer for the new GitHub architecture. As I’ve mentioned before (and more on this later), we’ve hired the excellent team at Anchor as our server specialists. Our team lead over there is Matt Palmer, and we left the choice of load balancer up to him and his expertise. He’s taken it upon himself to explain the driving factors behind his choice, and it makes for an enlightening read if you’re interested in such things. Just head on over to the Anchor blog to check it out:
http://www.anchor.com.au/blog/2009/10/load-balancing-at-github-why-ldirectord/
Be sure to read the comments where the author of haproxy weighs in on the post and adds some additional perspective. Like most technology decisions, there is no single correct answer. Only tradeoffs and preferences.
Written by
Related posts
Why developers still flock to Python: Guido van Rossum on readability, AI, and the future of programming
Discover how Python changed developer culture—and see why it keeps evolving.
Developers still need the right to challenge junk patents
Calling on developers, startups, and open source organizations to advocate against patent rules that would make it harder to challenge bad patents by the December 2 deadline.
GitHub Availability Report: October 2025
In October, we experienced four incidents that resulted in degraded performance across GitHub services.