Load Balancing at GitHub
We’ve had a number of inquiries into why we chose ldirectord as our primary load balancer for the new GitHub architecture. As I’ve mentioned before (and more on this later),…
We’ve had a number of inquiries into why we chose ldirectord as our primary load balancer for the new GitHub architecture. As I’ve mentioned before (and more on this later), we’ve hired the excellent team at Anchor as our server specialists. Our team lead over there is Matt Palmer, and we left the choice of load balancer up to him and his expertise. He’s taken it upon himself to explain the driving factors behind his choice, and it makes for an enlightening read if you’re interested in such things. Just head on over to the Anchor blog to check it out:
http://www.anchor.com.au/blog/2009/10/load-balancing-at-github-why-ldirectord/
Be sure to read the comments where the author of haproxy weighs in on the post and adds some additional perspective. Like most technology decisions, there is no single correct answer. Only tradeoffs and preferences.
Written by
Related posts
From pair to peer programmer: Our vision for agentic workflows in GitHub Copilot
AI agents in GitHub Copilot don’t just assist developers but actively solve problems through multi-step reasoning and execution. Here’s what that means.
GitHub Availability Report: May 2025
In May, we experienced three incidents that resulted in degraded performance across GitHub services.
GitHub Universe 2025: Here’s what’s in store at this year’s developer wonderland
Sharpen your skills, test out new tools, and connect with people who build like you.