Developers need the right to challenge junk patents
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently proposed rule changes that will make it harder to challenge low quality patents. Without the ability to quickly and efficiently challenge wrongly granted patents, innovation and developers suffer.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently proposed rule changes that will make it harder to challenge low quality patents. We echo the concerns raised by the Linux Foundation and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Without the ability to quickly and efficiently challenge wrongly granted patents, innovation and developers suffer.
The impact on developers, startups, and small companies
In 2011, Congress created inter partes review administered by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) as a lower-cost, more efficient procedure for the public to challenge low quality patents–patents that are not new or are obvious over past innovation–and so should not have been granted in the first place. The PTAB has saved billions in litigation costs and reduced the burden of patent trolls on developers, including startups and open source projects.
By restricting access to the PTAB, the proposed rule would be a step backward to an environment that allows low quality patents to stifle technological progress, directly in conflict with the legislation Congress passed to enable the public to remove bad patents.
A stated goal of the changes by the USPTO is to protect against “patentee harassment,” but, in our experience, this is a solution in search of a problem. On the contrary, allowing anyone to weed out low quality patents is vital to protect innovation and promote the public interest.
Weak patents asserted widely against our ecosystems introduce friction in the innovation cycle, hinder developers’ creativity, and impede freedom to make technological advancements. By ensuring we all have the right to advise the patent office that it granted a patent it shouldn’t have, we can ensure a fair and equitable patent system that fosters innovation and benefits all.
Taking action
We urge all developers and supporters–whether a student, open source maintainer, or enterprise (see Microsoft’s comment)–to voice their opposition today to the proposed rules using the USPTO’s public comment system. Regardless of the length or technicality of your comments, your input is vital in safeguarding innovation and advocating for a patent system that serves developers’ interests. Together, we can defend our right to challenge junk patents, protect developers from patent abuse, and foster an environment that nurtures innovation.
Written by
Related posts
Inside the research: How GitHub Copilot impacts the nature of work for open source maintainers
An interview with economic researchers analyzing the causal effect of GitHub Copilot on how open source maintainers work.
OpenAI’s latest o1 model now available in GitHub Copilot and GitHub Models
The December 17 release of OpenAI’s o1 model is now available in GitHub Copilot and GitHub Models, bringing advanced coding capabilities to your workflows.
Announcing 150M developers and a new free tier for GitHub Copilot in VS Code
Come and join 150M developers on GitHub that can now code with Copilot for free in VS Code.