Load Balancing at GitHub
We’ve had a number of inquiries into why we chose ldirectord as our primary load balancer for the new GitHub architecture. As I’ve mentioned before (and more on this later),…
We’ve had a number of inquiries into why we chose ldirectord as our primary load balancer for the new GitHub architecture. As I’ve mentioned before (and more on this later), we’ve hired the excellent team at Anchor as our server specialists. Our team lead over there is Matt Palmer, and we left the choice of load balancer up to him and his expertise. He’s taken it upon himself to explain the driving factors behind his choice, and it makes for an enlightening read if you’re interested in such things. Just head on over to the Anchor blog to check it out:
http://www.anchor.com.au/blog/2009/10/load-balancing-at-github-why-ldirectord/
Be sure to read the comments where the author of haproxy weighs in on the post and adds some additional perspective. Like most technology decisions, there is no single correct answer. Only tradeoffs and preferences.
Written by
Related posts
What’s coming to our GitHub Actions 2026 security roadmap
A look at GitHub Actions’ 2026 roadmap, outlining how secure defaults, policy controls, and CI/CD observability harden the software supply chain end to end.
Updates to GitHub Copilot interaction data usage policy
From April 24 onward, interaction data—specifically inputs, outputs, code snippets, and associated context—from Copilot Free, Pro, and Pro+ users will be used to train and improve our AI models unless they opt out.
GitHub availability report: February 2026
In February, we experienced six incidents that resulted in degraded performance across GitHub services.